8. Fair value of financial instruments
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. It is therefore a market-based measurement and not specific to each entity.
If there is no market price for a given financial asset or liability, its fair value is estimated on the basis of the price established in recent transactions involving similar instruments or, in the absence thereof, by using mathematical measurement models that are sufficiently tried and trusted by the international financial community. The estimates used in such models take into consideration the specific features of the asset or liability to be measured and, in particular, the various types of risk associated with the asset or liability. However, the limitations inherent in the measurement models and possible inaccuracies in the assumptions and parameters required by these models may mean that the estimated fair value of an asset or liability does not exactly match the price for which the asset or liability could be exchanged or settled on the date of its measurement.
The fair value of the financial derivatives included in the held-for-trading portfolios is based on daily quoted price if there is an active market for these financial derivatives. If for any reason their quoted price is not available on a given date, these financial derivatives are measured using methods similar to those used in over-the-counter (OTC) markets.
The fair value of OTC derivatives (“present value” or “theoretical price”) is equal to the sum of future cash flows arising from the instrument, discounted at the measurement date; these derivatives are valued using methods recognized by international financial markets: the “net present value” (NPV) method, option price calculation models, etc.
Below is a comparison of the carrying amount of the Group’s financial instruments in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and their respective fair values. Not all assets and liabilities are registered at fair value. The following items are registered at their amortized cost: “Cash and balances with central banks”, “Loans and receivables”, “Held to maturity investments” and financial liabilities at amortized cost:
Download ExcelFair Value and Carrying Amount |
|
Millions of Euros | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Notes | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||
Carrying Amount | Fair Value | Carrying Amount | Fair Value | Carrying Amount | Fair Value | ||
ASSETS- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and balances with central banks | 9 | 34,903 | 34,903 | 35,494 | 35,494 | 29,841 | 29,841 |
Financial assets held for trading | 10 | 72,112 | 72,112 | 79,829 | 79,829 | 70,471 | 70,471 |
Other financial assets designated at fair value through profit or loss | 11 | 2,413 | 2,413 | 2,530 | 2,530 | 2,773 | 2,773 |
Available-for-sale financial assets | 12 | 77,774 | 77,774 | 67,500 | 67,500 | 54,641 | 54,641 |
Loans and receivables | 13 | 350,945 | 364,120 | 371,347 | 391,594 | 369,916 | 377,722 |
Held-to-maturity investments | 14 | - | - | 10,162 | 9,805 | 10,955 | 10,190 |
Fair value changes of the hedges items in portfolio hedges of interest rate risk | 15 | 98 | 98 | 226 | 226 | 146 | 146 |
Hedging derivatives | 15 | 2,530 | 2,530 | 4,894 | 4,894 | 4,538 | 4,538 |
LIABILITIES- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets held for trading | 10 | 45,648 | 45,648 | 55,834 | 55,834 | 51,178 | 51,178 |
Other financial liabilities designated at fair value through profit or loss | 11 | 2,467 | 2,467 | 2,216 | 2,216 | 1,621 | 1,621 |
Financial liabilities at amortized cost | 23 | 464,141 | 466,240 | 490,605 | 488,163 | 465,717 | 459,698 |
Fair value changes of the hedged items in portfolio hedges of interest rate risk. | 15 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Hedging derivatives | 15 | 1,792 | 1,792 | 2,968 | 2,968 | 2,709 | 2,709 |
For financial instruments whose carrying amount is equivalent to their fair value, the measurement processes used are set forth below:
- Level 1: Measurement using market observable quoted prices for the financial instrument in question, secured from independent sources and referred to active markets. This level includes listed debt securities, listed equity instruments, some derivatives and mutual funds.
- Level 2: Measurement that applies techniques using inputs drawn from observable market data.
- Level 3: Measurement using techniques where some of the inputs are not taken from market observable data. As of December 31, 2013, the affected instruments accounted for approximately 0.16% of financial assets and 0.01% of the Group’s financial liabilities. Model selection and validation is undertaken by control areas outside the market units.
8.1 Fair value of certain financial instruments registered at fair value using valuation criteria
The following table shows the main financial instruments carried at fair value in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, broken down by the measurement technique used to determine their fair value:
Download ExcelFair Value by Levels |
|
Millions of Euros | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Notes | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | ||
ASSETS- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets held for trading | 10 | 34,394 | 37,427 | 290 | 30,890 | 48,530 | 412 | 22,952 | 46,819 | 700 |
Loans and advances to customers |
|
- | 106 | - | 244 | - | - | - | - | - |
Debt securities |
|
28,573 | 852 | 176 | 27,007 | 718 | 295 | 19,703 | 792 | 450 |
Equity instruments |
|
4,596 | 111 | 58 | 2,705 | 140 | 70 | 2,027 | 97 | 68 |
Trading derivatives |
|
1,225 | 36,358 | 56 | 934 | 47,672 | 47 | 1,221 | 45,930 | 182 |
Other financial assets designated at fair value through profit or loss | 11 | 2,352 | 61 | - | 2,468 | 62 | - | 2,358 | 415 | - |
Loans and advances to credit institutions |
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Debt securities |
|
603 | 61 | - | 691 | 62 | - | 647 | 61 | - |
Equity instruments |
|
1,749 | - | - | 1,777 | - | - | 1,711 | 354 | - |
Available-for-sale financial assets | 12 | 57,957 | 18,710 | 591 | 47,692 | 18,545 | 753 | 38,193 | 14,844 | 1,064 |
Debt securities |
|
52,726 | 18,515 | 566 | 44,496 | 18,353 | 699 | 34,195 | 14,620 | 602 |
Equity instruments |
|
5,231 | 195 | 25 | 3,196 | 192 | 54 | 3,998 | 224 | 462 |
Hedging derivatives | 15 | 52 | 2,478 | - | 111 | 4,783 | - | 289 | 4,249 | - |
LIABILITIES- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities held for trading | 10 | 8,459 | 37,172 | 17 | 7,371 | 48,425 | 38 | 5,813 | 45,342 | 23 |
Trading derivatives |
|
931 | 37,172 | 17 | 791 | 48,425 | 38 | 1,202 | 45,342 | 23 |
Short positions |
|
7,528 | - | - | 6,580 | - | - | 4,611 | - | - |
Other financial liabilities designated at fair value through profit or loss | 11 | - | 2,467 | - | - | 2,216 | - | - | 1,621 | - |
Hedging derivatives | 15 | - | 1,757 | 35 | - | 2,951 | 17 | - | 2,709 | - |
The heading “Available-for-sale financial assets” in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 additionally includes €516, €510 million and €541 million, respectively, accounted for at cost, as indicated in the section of this Note entitled “Financial instruments at cost”.
Process for determining the fair value established in the entity
To ensure that trading portfolio assets are properly valued, BBVA has established, at a geographic level, a structure of New Product Committees responsible for validating and approving new products or types of assets and liabilities before being contracted. The members of these Committees, responsible for valuation, are independent from the business.
These areas are required to ensure, prior to the approval stage, the existence of not only technical and human resources, but also adequate informational sources to measure these assets and liabilities, in accordance with the rules established by the Global Valuation Area and using models that have been validated and approved by the Department of Technology and Methodologies that reports to GRM (see Note 7).
Additionally, for assets that show significant uncertainty in inputs or model parameters used for assessment, criteria is established to measure said uncertainty and activity limits are set based on these.
Finally, these measurements are compared, as much as possible, against other sources such as the measurements obtained by the business teams or those obtained by other market participants.
The following table sets forth the main measurement techniques, hypothesis and inputs used in the estimation of fair value of the financial instruments classified under Levels 2 and 3, based on the type of financial asset and liability and the corresponding balances as of December 31, 2013:
Download ExcelFinancial Instruments Level 2 |
Fair Value (Millons of euros) | Main Measurement techniques | Main inputs used |
---|---|---|---|
Loans and advances to customers |
|
Present value Method
Determining the present-value of financial instruments as the current value of future cash flows (discounted at market interest rates), taking into account: – the estimate of prepayment rates; – the issuer credit risk; and – current market interest rates. – Net Asset Value (NAV) published recurrently, but not more frequently than every quarter |
– Risk premiums. – Observable market interest rates |
Available-for-sale financial assets | 106 | ||
Debt securities |
|
||
Trading portfolio | 852 | ||
Other financial assets at fair value through profit and loss | 61 | ||
Available-for-sale financial assets | 18,515 | ||
Equity Instruments |
|
||
Trading portfolio | 111 | ||
Available-for-sale financial assets | 195 | ||
Other financial liabilities |
|
||
Other financial liabilities designated at fair value through profit or loss | 2,467 | ||
Trading derivatives |
|
• Commodities: Discounted cash flows and moment adjustment • Credit products: Default model, Gaussian copula and Black Derman Toy • Exchange rate products: Discounted cash flows and Black Scholes • Fixed income products: Discounted cash flows • Equity instruments: Local-Vol, Black and Discounted cash flows • Interest rate products: – Interest rate swaps, Call money Swaps y FRA: Discounted cash flows – Caps/Floors , bond options y Swaptions: Black – Interest rate options: Hull-White y SABR |
Observable market data |
Trading asset portfolio | 36,358 | ||
Trading liability portfolio | 37,172 | ||
Hedging derivatives |
|
||
Asset | 2,478 | ||
Liability | 1,757 |
Financial Instruments Level 3 |
Fair Value (Millons of euros) | Main Measurement techniques | Main inputs used |
---|---|---|---|
Debt securities |
|
• CDO: Time Default Model (Probability of default measure) |
– Correlation of defaults extrapolated from several index tranches (ITRA00 nad CDX) with the underlying portfolio of our CDOs |
Trading portfolio | 176 | ||
Available-for-sale financial assets | 566 | ||
Equity Instruments |
|
Present-value method
(Discounted future cash flows) |
– Prepayment Rates – Default Correlation – Credit Spread – NAV supplied by the fund administrator or issuer of the securities |
Trading portfolio | 58 | ||
Available-for-sale financial assets | 25 | ||
Trading derivatives |
|
• Credit Option: Gaussian Copula and Libor Market Model • Equity OTC Options : Heston • Interest rate options: Libor Market Model |
– Non directly observable market data – Historical Series |
Trading asset portfolio | 57 | ||
Trading liability portfolio | 17 | ||
Hedging derivatives |
|
||
Liability | 35 |
Adjustments to the valuation for risk of default
The credit valuation adjustments (“CVA”) and debit valuation adjustments (“DVA”) are a part of derivative valuations, both assets and liabilities, to reflect the impact in the fair value of the credit risk of the counterparty and its own, respectively.
These adjustments are calculated by estimating Exposure At Default, Probability of Default and Loss Given Default, for all derivative products on any instrument at the legal entity level (all counterparties under a same ISDA / CMOF) in which BBVA has exposure.
As a general rule, the calculation of CVA is done through simulations of market and credit variables to calculate the expected positive exposure, given the Exposure at Default and multiplying the result by the Loss Given Default of the counterparty. Consequently, the DVA is calculated as the result of the expected negative exposure given the Exposure at Default and multiplying the result by the Loss Given Default of the counterparty. Both calculations are performed throughout the entire period of potential exposure.
The information needed to calculate the exposure at default and the loss given default come from the credit markets (Credit Default Swaps or iTraxx Indexes), save for cases where an internal rating is available. For those cases where the information is not available, BBVA implements a mapping process based on the sector, rating and geography to assign probabilities of both probability of default and loss given default, calibrated directly to market or with an adjustment market factor for the probability of default and the historical expected loss.
The impact recorded under "Net gains (losses) on financial asset and liabilities" in the consolidated income statement for the year ended December 31, 2013 corresponding to the credit risk assessment of the asset derivative positions as "Credit Valuation Adjustment" (CVA) and liabilities derivative position as "Debit Valuation Adjustment" (DVA), was not material.
Financial assets and liabilities classified as Level 3
The changes in the balance of Level 3 financial assets and liabilities included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets are as follows:
Download ExcelFinancial Assets Level 3 Changes in the Period |
Millions of Euros | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2013 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||
Assets | Liabilities | Assets | Liabilities | Assets | Liabilities | |
Balance at the beginning | 1,165 | 55 | 1,764 | 23 | 1,469 | 25 |
Valuation adjustments recognized in the income statement (*) | 7 | 15 | 51 | 2 | (1) | (12) |
Valuation adjustments not recognized in the income statement | - | - | (3) | - | - | - |
Acquisitions, disposals and liquidations | (374) | (18) | (279) | 29 | 266 | 9 |
Net transfers to Level 3 | 180 | - | (134) | - | 33 | - |
Exchange differences and others | (95) | (1) | (233) | 1 | (3) | 1 |
Exchange differences and others | 881 | 52 | 1,165 | 55 | 1,764 | 23 |
As of December 31, 2013, the profit/loss on sales of financial instruments classified as level 3 recognized in the accompanying income statement was not material.
Transfers between levels
The Global Valuation Area, in collaboration with the Technology and Methodology Area, has established the rules for a proper trading portfolio asset classification according to the fair value hierarchy defined by international accounting standards.
On a monthly basis, any new assets registered in the portfolio are classified, according to this criterion, by the generating subsidiary. Then, there is a quarterly review of the portfolio in order to analyze the need for a change in classification of any of these assets.
The financial instruments transferred between the different levels of measurement in 2013 are at the following amounts in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2013:
Download Excel
|
Millions of Euros | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
From: | Level I | Level 2 | Level 3 | |||
Transfer between levels | To: | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 1 | Level 3 | Level 1 | Level2 |
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets held for trading |
|
- | 5 | 18 | 2 | - | 3 |
Available-for-sale financial assets |
|
7 | 190 | 172 | - | 5 | 9 |
LIABILITIES- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sensitivity Analysis
Sensitivity analysis is performed on products with significant unobservable inputs (products included in level 3), in order to obtain a reasonable range of possible alternative valuations. This analysis is carried out on a monthly basis, based on the criteria defined by the Global Valuation Area taking into account the nature of the methods used for the assessment and the reliability and availability of inputs and proxies used. In order to establish, with a sufficient degree of certainty, the valuating risk that is incurred in such assets without applying diversification criteria between them.
As of December 31, 2013, the effect on the consolidated income and consolidated equity of changing the main hypotheses used for the measurement of Level 3 financial instruments for other reasonably possible models, taking the highest (most favorable hypotheses) or lowest (least favorable hypotheses) value of the range deemed probable, would be as follows:
Download ExcelFinancial Assets Level 3 Sensitivity Analysis |
Millions of Euros | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Potential Impact on Consolidated Income Statement | Potential Impact on Total Equity | |||
Most Favorable Hypothesis | Least Favorable Hypothesis | Most Favorable Hypothesis | Least Favorable Hypothesis | |
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
Financial assets held for trading | 16 | (13) | - | - |
Available-for-sale financial assets | - | - | 11 | (11) |
LIABILITIES- |
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities held for trading | 1 | (1) | - | - |
Total | 17 | (14) | 11 | (11) |
8.2 Fair value of financial instruments carried at cost using valuation criteria
The valuation methods used to calculate the fair value of financial assets and liabilities carried at cost are presented below:
- The fair value of "Cash and balances with central banks" has been assimilated to their book value, as it is mainly short-term balances.
- The fair value of the "Loans and advances to customers" and "financial liabilities at amortized cost" was estimated using the method of discounted expected future cash flows using market interest rates at the end of each year. Additionally, factors such as prepayment rates and correlations of default are taken into account.
The following table presents key financial instruments carried at amortized cost in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, broken down according to the method of valuation used to estimate their fair value:
Download ExcelFair Value by Levels |
|
Millions of Euros | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Notes | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||
|
|
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 |
ASSETS- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and balances with central banks | 9 | 34,903 | - | - | 35,494 | - | - | 29,841 | - | - |
Loans and receivables | 13 |
|
1,351 | 362,769 | - | - | 391,594 | - | - | 377,722 |
LIABILITIES- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities at amortized cost | 23 | - | - | 466,240 | - | - | 488,163 | - | - | 459,698 |
The main valuation methods, hypotheses and inputs used to estimate the fair value of financial instruments accounted for at cost and classified in levels 2 and 3 is shown below. These are broken down by type of financial instrument and the balances correspond to those at December 31, 2013:
Download ExcelFinancial Instruments Level 2 |
Fair Value (Millons of euros) | Main Measurement techniques | Main inputs used |
---|---|---|---|
Loans and receivables |
|
Present-value method
(Discounted future cash flows) |
– Default correlation – Credit spread |
Debt securities | 1,351 |
|
|
Financial Instruments Level 3 | Fair Value (Millons of euros) | Main Measurement techniques | Main inputs used |
---|---|---|---|
Loans and receivables |
|
Present-value method
(Discounted future cash flows) |
– Prepayment rates – Default correlation – Credit spread – Market interest rates |
Loans and advances to credit institutions | 22,147 | ||
Loans and advances to customers | 337,742 | ||
Debt securities | 2,881 | ||
Financial liabilities at amortized cost |
|
||
Deposits from central banks | 31,018 | ||
Deposits from credit institutions | 51,859 | ||
Customer deposits | 301,187 | ||
Debt certificates | 64,984 | ||
Sobordinated liabilities | 11,206 | ||
Other financial liabilities | 5,985 |
Financial instruments at cost
As of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, there were equity instruments and certain discretionary profit-sharing arrangements in some entities which were recognized at cost in the Group’s consolidated balance sheets because their fair value could not be reliably determined, as they were not traded in organized markets and, thus, their unobservable inputs are significant. On the above dates, the balances of these financial instruments recognized in the portfolio of available-for-sale financial assets amounted to €516, €510 million and €541 million, respectively.
The table below outlines the financial assets and liabilities carried at cost that were sold in the year ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011:
Download ExcelSales of financial instruments at cost | Millions of Euros | ||
---|---|---|---|
2013 | 2012 | 2011 | |
Amount of Sale | 76 | 29 | 19 |
Carrying Amount at Sale Date | 62 | 5 | 8 |
Gains/Losses | 13 | 24 | 11 |