Logotype

Information of Prudential Relevance 2014

4.8. RWA density by geographical area

Print this page

A summary of the average weighting percentages by exposure category existing in the main geographical areas in which the Group operates is shown below, for the purpose of obtaining an overview of the entity's risk profile in terms of RWAs.

TABLE 46: Breakdown of RWA density by geographical area and approach

(Millions of euros)

Category of exposure RWA density
TOTAL Spain Eurasia Mexico U.S. South America Rest of the World
Central governments or central banks 28% 0% 10% 0% 1% 101% 0%
Deferred tax assets 100% 100% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Regional governments or local authorities 45% 21% 23% 24% 60% 46% 0%
Public sector entities 53% 15% 94% 48% 5% 82% 0%
Multilateral Development Banks 30% 20% 0% 0% 0% 66% 0%
International organizations 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Institutions 23% 0% 22% 20% 18% 29% 21%
Corporates 93% 94% 99% 70% 91% 99% 100%
Retail 71% 67% 69% 75% 68% 72% 75%
Secured by mortgages on immovable property 38% 37% 40% 36% 37% 41% 36%
Exposures in default 104% 107% 101% 100% 101% 100% 100%
Items associated with particularly high risk 90% 90% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0%
Covered bonds 20% 0% 0% 20% 0% 0% 0%
Short-term claims on institutions and corporate 23% 22% 0% 0% 21% 31% 0%
Collective investments undertakings (CIU) 28% 20% 20% 0% 20% 100% 0%
Other exposures 55% 93% 13% 43% 32% 30% 0%
Securitized positions 41% 291% 0% 58% 26% 0% 0%
TOTAL CREDIT RISK BY THE STANDARDIZED
APPROACH
53% 40% 45% 32% 62% 76% 57%
Central governments or central banks 8% 33% 3% 12% 1% 11% 16%
Institutions 11% 15% 7% 3% 17% 24% 14%
Corporates 59% 59% 56% 74% 39% 50% 66%
Retail 24% 18% 8% 97% 6% 11% 7%
Equity Exposures 204% 180% 217% 236% 272% 248% 308%
Securitized positions 70% 71% 0% 0% 5% 0% 104%
TOTAL CREDIT RISK BY THE ADVANCED MEASUREMENT
APPROACH
37% 33% 32% 87% 29% 67% 53%
TOTAL CREDIT RISK DILUTION AND DELIVERY 45% 35% 36% 50% 58% 76% 53%
Note: Positions in equity are not included.

As shown, the Group has a RWA density below 50%, with the lowest densities concentrated in the euro zone countries (in line with the rest of Spanish peers) and the highest in the Americas. The reason for this lies in:

  • The weight that the advanced measurement approaches represent in Spain with respect to the rest of the countries in which the Group operates, as explained in section 4.2.3.
  • The RWs applied to European PAs represent a small percentage with respect to the RWs applied to the PAs outside the euro zone.
  • Moreover, the exposures in Europe with institutional counterparties (which have a low associated RW) represent a higher percentage of the portfolio's total than in the rest of the Group's countries.

Tools