8. Fair value of financial instruments
The fair value of a financial asset or a liability on a given date is the amount for which it could be exchanged or settled, respectively, on that date between two knowledgeable, willing parties in an arm’s length transaction under market conditions. The most objective and common reference for the fair value of a financial asset or a liability is the price that would be paid for it on an organized, transparent and deep market (“quoted price” or “market price”).
If there is no market price for a given financial asset or liability, its fair value is estimated on the basis of the price established in recent transactions involving similar instruments; or, in the absence thereof, by using mathematical measurement models that are sufficiently tried and trusted by the international financial community. The estimates used in such models take into consideration the specific features of the asset or liability to be measured and, in particular, the various types of risk associated with the asset or liability. However, the limitations inherent in the measurement models and possible inaccuracies in the assumptions and parameters required by these models may mean that the estimated fair value of an asset or liability does not coincide exactly with the price for which the asset or liability could be exchanged or settled on the date of its measurement.
The fair value of the financial derivatives included in the held for trading portfolios is assimilated to their daily quoted price if there is an active market for these financial instruments. If for any reason their quoted price cannot be established on a given date, these derivatives are measured using methods similar to those used in over-the-counter (“OTC”) markets.
The fair value of OTC derivatives (“present value” or “theoretical price”) is equal to the sum of future cash flows arising from the instrument, discounted at the measurement date; these derivatives are valued using methods recognized by international financial markets: the “net present value” (NPV) method, option price calculation models, etc.
Determining the fair value of financial instruments -
Below is a comparison of the carrying amount of the Group’s financial assets and liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and their respective fair values:
Fair Value and Carrying Amount | Notes | Millions of Euros | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||
Carrying Amount | Fair Value | Carrying Amount | Fair Value | Carrying Amount | Fair Value | ||
ASSETS- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and balances with central banks | 9 | 30,939 | 30,939 | 19,981 | 19,981 | 16,344 | 16,344 |
Financial assets held for trading | 10 | 70,602 | 70,602 | 63,283 | 63,283 | 69,733 | 69,733 |
Other financial assets designated at fair value through profit or loss | 11 | 2,977 | 2,977 | 2,774 | 2,774 | 2,337 | 2,337 |
Available-for-sale financial assets | 12 | 58,144 | 58,144 | 56,456 | 56,456 | 63,521 | 63,521 |
Loans and receivables | 13 | 381,076 | 389,204 | 364,707 | 371,359 | 346,117 | 354,933 |
Held-to-maturity investments | 14 | 10,955 | 10,190 | 9,946 | 9,189 | 5,437 | 5,493 |
Fair value changes of the hedges items in portfolio hedges of interes rate risk | 15 | 146 | 146 | 40 | 40 | - | - |
Hedging derivatives | 15 | 4,552 | 4,552 | 3,563 | 3,563 | 3,595 | 3,595 |
LIABILITIES- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets held for trading | 10 | 51,303 | 51,303 | 37,212 | 37,212 | 32,830 | 32,830 |
Other financial liabilities designated at fair value through profit or loss | 11 | 1,825 | 1,825 | 1,607 | 1,607 | 1,367 | 1,367 |
Financial liabilities at amortized cost | 23 | 479,904 | 473,886 | 453,164 | 453,504 | 447,936 | 448,537 |
Fair value changes of the hedged items in portfolio hedges of interest rate risk. | 15 | - | - | (2) | (2) | - | - |
Hedging derivatives | 15 | 2,710 | 2,710 | 1,664 | 1,664 | 1,308 | 1,308 |
In the case of financial instruments whose carrying amount is not the same as their theoretical fair value, the fair value has been calculated in the following manner:
- The fair value of “Cash and balances with central banks” has been considered equivalent to its carrying amount, because they are short-term balances.
- The fair value of “Held-to-maturity investments” is equivalent to their quoted price in active markets.
- The fair values of “Loans and receivables” and “Financial liabilities at amortized cost” have been estimated by discounting estimated future cash flows using the market interest rates prevailing at each year-end.
- The “Fair value changes of the hedged items in portfolio hedges of interest-rate risk” item in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets registers the difference between the carrying amount of the hedged deposits lent, registered under "Loans and Receivables," and the fair value calculated using internal models and observable variables of market data (see Note 15).
For financial instruments whose carrying amount is equivalent to their fair value, the measurement processes used are set forth below:
- Level 1: Measurement using market observable quoted prices for the financial instrument in question, secured from independent sources and linked to active markets. This level includes listed debt securities, listed equity instruments, some derivatives and mutual funds.
- Level 2: Measurement that applies techniques using inputs drawn from observable market data.
- Level 3: Measurement using techniques, where some of the inputs are not taken from market observable data. As of December 31, 2011, the affected instruments accounted for approximately 0.31% of financial assets and 0.004% of the Group’s financial liabilities. Model selection and validation was undertaken by control areas outside the market units.
The following table shows the main financial instruments carried at fair value in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, broken down by the measurement technique used to determine their fair value:
Fair Value by Levels | Notes | Millions of Euros | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | ||
ASSETS- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets held for trading | 10 | 22,986 | 46,915 | 700 | 28,914 | 33,568 | 802 | 39,608 | 29,236 | 889 |
Debt securities |
|
19,731 | 793 | 451 | 22,930 | 921 | 508 | 33,043 | 1,157 | 471 |
Equity instruments |
|
2,033 | 97 | 68 | 5,034 | 92 | 134 | 5,504 | 94 | 185 |
Trading derivatives |
|
1,222 | 46,025 | 182 | 950 | 32,555 | 160 | 1,060 | 27,985 | 233 |
Other financial assets designated at fair value through profit or loss | 11 | 2,358 | 619 | - | 2,326 | 448 | - | 1,960 | 377 | - |
Debt securities |
|
647 | 61 | - | 624 | 64 | - | 584 | 54 | - |
Equity instruments |
|
1,711 | 558 | - | 1,702 | 384 | - | 1,376 | 323 | - |
Available-for-sale financial assets | 12 | 41,286 | 15,249 | 1,067 | 41,500 | 13,789 | 668 | 49,747 | 12,367 | 818 |
Debt securities |
|
37,286 | 15,025 | 602 | 37,024 | 13,352 | 499 | 44,387 | 12,146 | 538 |
Equity instruments |
|
4,000 | 224 | 465 | 4,476 | 437 | 169 | 5,360 | 221 | 280 |
Hedging derivatives | 15 | 289 | 4,263 | - | 265 | 3,298 | - | 302 | 3,293 | - |
LIABILITIES- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities held for trading | 10 | 5,813 | 45,467 | 23 | 4,961 | 32,225 | 25 | 4,936 | 27,797 | 96 |
Trading derivatives |
|
1,202 | 45,467 | 23 | 916 | 32,225 | 25 | 1,107 | 27,797 | 96 |
Short positions |
|
4,611 | - | - | 4,046 | - | - | 3,830 | - | - |
Other financial liabilities designated at fair value through profit or loss | 11 | - | 1,825 | - | - | 1,607 | - | - | 1,367 | - |
Hedging derivatives | 15 | - | 2,710 | - | 96 | 1,568 | - | 319 | 989 | - |
The heading “Available-for-sale-financial assets” in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, additionally includes €541 million, €499 million and €589 million, respectively, accounted for at cost, as indicated in the section of this Note entitled “Financial instruments at cost”.
The following table sets forth the main measurement techniques, hypotheses and inputs used in the estimation of fair value of the financial instruments classified under Levels 2 and 3, based on the type of financial asset and liability and the corresponding balances as of December 31, 2011:
Financial Instruments Level 2 | Measurement techniques | Main assumptions | Main inputs used | 2011 Fair value (millions of euros) |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
• Debt securities | Present-value method. | Calculation of the present value of financial instruments as the current value of future cash flows (discounted at market interest rates), taking into account: • the estimate of prepayment rates; • the issuer credit risk; and • current market interest rates. • Net Asset Value (NAV) published recurrently, but not more frequently than every quarter. |
• Risk premiums. • Observable market interest rates |
Trading portfolio | |
Debt securities |
793 | ||||
Equity instruments | 97 | ||||
|
|||||
Other financial assets at fair value through profit or loss | |||||
• Equity instruments | Debt securities |
61 | |||
Equity instruments | 558 | ||||
Available-for-sale financial assets | |||||
Debt securities |
15,025 | ||||
Equity instruments | 224 | ||||
Other financial liabilities designated at fair value through profit or loss | 1,825 | ||||
• Derivatives | Analytic/semi-analytic formulae | For share, currency, inflation or commodity derivatives: • The Black-Scholes assumptions take into account possible convexity adjustments For interest rate derivatives: • Black-Scholes assumptions apply a lognormal process for forward rates and consider possible convexity adjustments. |
For share, currency, or commodity derivatives: • Forward structure of the underlying asset. • Volatility of options. • Observable correlations between underlying assets. • For interest-rate derivatives: • The term structure of interest rates. • Volatility of underlying asset. For credit derivatives: • Credit default swap (CDS) prices. • Historical CDS volatility. |
Assets | |
Trading derivatives | 46,025 | ||||
Hedging Derivatives | 4,263 | ||||
For share, currency, or commodity derivatives: • Monte Carlo simulations. |
Local volatility model: assumes a constant diffusion of the underlying asset with the volatility depending on the value of the underlying asset and the term. | Liabilities | |||
For interest-rate derivatives: • Black-Derman-Toy Model, Libor Market Model and SABR. • HW 1 factor |
This model assumes that: The forward rates in the term structure of the interest rate curve are perfectly correlated. |
Trading derivatives | 45,467 | ||
For credit derivatives: • Diffusion models. |
These models assume a constant diffusion of default intensity. |
Hedging Derivatives | 2,710 |
Financial Instruments Level 3 | Measurement techniques | Main assumptions | Main unobservable inputs | 2011 Fair value (millions of euros) |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Debt securities | • Present-value method. • “Time default” model for financial instruments in the collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) family. |
Determining the current value of financial instruments as the current value of future cash flows (discounted at market interest rates), taking into account: • estimate of prepayment rates; • issuer credit risk; and • current market interest rates. In the case of measurement of asset-backed securities (ABSs), future prepayments are calculated on the conditional prepayment rates that the issuers themselves provide. The “time-to-default” model is used to measure default probability. One of the main variables used is the correlation of defaults extrapolated from several index tranches (ITRA00 and CDX) with the underlying portfolio of our CDOs. |
• Prepayment rates • Default correlation • Credit spread (1) |
Trading portfolio | |
Debt securities |
451 | ||||
Equity instruments | 68 | ||||
Available-for-sale financial assets | |||||
Debt securities |
602 | ||||
Equity instruments | • Present-value method. | Net asset value (NAV) for hedge fund and for equity instruments listed in thin or less active markets. |
• Credit spread (1) NAV supplied by the fund manager or issuer of the securities. |
Equity instruments | 465 |
Trading derivatives | Trading derivatives for interest-rate futures and forwards: • Present-value method. • “Libor Market” model. |
The “Libor Market" model models the complete term structure of the interest-rate curve, assuming a constant elasticity of variance (CEV) lognormal process. The CEV lognormal process is used to measure the presence of a volatility shift. |
Correlation decay.(2) | Assets | |
For variable income and foreign exchange options: • Monte Carlo simulations • Numerical integration • Heston |
The options are measured through generally accepted valuation models, to which the observed implied volatility is added. | • Vol-of-Vol (3) • Reversion factor (4) • Volatility Spot Correlation (5) |
Trading derivatives | 182 | |
Liabilities | |||||
• Credit baskets | These models assume a constant diffusion of default intensity. |
• Default correlation. • Historical CDS volatility |
Trading derivatives | 23 |
The changes in the balance of Level 3 financial assets and liabilities included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets are as follows:
Financial Assets Level 3 Changes in the Period |
Millions of Euros | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||
Assets | Liabilities | Assets | Liabilities | Assets | Liabilities | |
Balance at the beginning | 1,469 | 25 | 1,707 | 96 | 3,853 | 84 |
Valuation adjustments recognized in the income statement (*) | (1) | (12) | (123) | 12 | (146) | 6 |
Valuation adjustments not recognized in the income statement | - | - | (18) | - | 33 | - |
Acquisitions, disposals and liquidations | 268 | 9 | (334) | (100) | (634) | (1) |
Net transfers to Level 3 | 33 | - | 236 | - | (1,375) | 7 |
Exchange differences | (2) | 1 | 1 | 17 | (24) | - |
Exchange differences | 1,767 | 23 | 1,469 | 25 | 1,707 | 96 |
The financial instruments transferred between the different levels of measurement in 2011 are at the following amounts in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2011:
Transfer between levels | From: To: |
Millions of Euros | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Level I | Level 2 | Level 3 | |||||
Level 2 | Level 3 | Level 1 | Level 3 | Level 1 | Level2 | ||
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets held for trading |
|
12 | - | 32 | 16 | - | 36 |
Available-for-sale financial assets |
|
432 | 23 | 49 | 39 | - | - |
LIABILITIES- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2011, the effect on the consolidated income and consolidated equity of changing the main hypotheses used for the measurement of Level 3 financial instruments for other reasonably possible models, taking the highest (most favorable hypotheses) or lowest (least favorable) value of the range deemed probable, would be as follows:
Financial Assets Level 3 Sensitivity Analysis |
Millions of Euros | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Potential Impact on Consolidated Income Statement | Potential Impact on Total Equity | |||
Most Favorable Hypotheses | Least Favorable Hypotheses | Most Favorable Hypotheses | Least Favorable Hypotheses | |
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
Financial assets held for trading | 21 | (71) | - | - |
Available-for-sale financial assets | - | - | 14 | (87) |
LIABILITIES- | ||||
Financial liabilities held for trading | 1 | (1) | - | - |
Total | 22 | (72) | 14 | (87) |
Loans and financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss -
As of December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, there were no loans or financial liabilities at fair value other than those recognized under the headings "Other financial assets designated at fair value through profit and loss" and "Other financial liabilities designated at fair value through profit and loss" in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Financial instruments at cost -
As of December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, equity instruments, derivatives with these equity instruments as underlyings, and certain discretionary profit-sharing arrangements in some companies, were recognized at cost in the Group's consolidated balance sheets because their fair value could not be reliably determined, as they are not traded in organized markets and thus their unobservable inputs are significant. On the above dates, the balance of these financial instruments recognized in the portfolio of available-for-sale financial assets amounted to €541 million, €499 million and €589 million, respectively.
The table below outlines the financial assets and liabilities carried at cost that were sold in 2011, 2010 and 2009:
Sales of financial instruments at cost | Millions of Euros | ||
---|---|---|---|
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | |
Amount of Sale | 19 | 51 | 73 |
Carrying Amount at Sale Date | 8 | 36 | 64 |
Gains/Losses | 11 | 15 | 9 |